Tuesday 10 June 2014

CC7.10a The Library of Alexandria, Episode 1: The Great Library

[I'm cheating a little with the title here, which should match the story as a whole; but since I had to resort to threads on Gallifrey Base just to find out the intended episode names, I doubt anyone will object. And I do so like distinct titles!]

I wasn't going to cover this yet. I'd decided (having reviewed rather too many audios in a row) that it was time to draw a line under Iananbarbara's era and get on with the next phase; but I was in the mood for listening to something new, and it caught my fancy.

I'm very glad it did. This is excellent.

First off, William Russell is on particularly fine form here. He's always good value, but there have been a couple of audios lately - The Masters of Luxor and The Wanderer - where he wasn't quite up to his normal standard. This, on the other hand, is right back to the heights of Rise and Fall or Transit of Venus: there's more power in his voice, which supports the rhythm of his reading. Lovely.

The second voice artist, Susan Franklyn, is no letdown either, giving a strong performance as Hypatia. Because I came to this after watching (and enjoying) the film Agora, with Rachel Weisz in the role, I picture Hypatia as Weisz. Franklyn's voice and interpretations are similar enough that this didn't clash, which meant I had a clearer picture than I often do.

Staying with the sound for a minute, the use of Spanish guitar surprised me, but is effective in creating the right atmosphere (and felt like the sort of music they might have had on TV, being used in a fairly restrained manner). In fact, overall, Toby Hrycek-Robinson's soundscape is great - pleasant to listen to, and I always had a clear image of what was going on. Presumably this is also down to Lisa Bowerman's directorial choices, and it is certainly helped by Simon Guerrier's script, which the rest of this review will focus on.

[There will be minor spoilers in the next few paragraphs, and major ones at the end - I'll warn you when those are coming up.]

There are a few things which mark this out as being the product of an era later than the one in which it is set. First is a repeat of the trick they pulled in The Romans, opening the story after the travellers have been relaxing in the location for a significant period of time. (Well, Ian's been working, fulfilling the traditional postwar male role of sole provider; but he seems to be quite happy in his job.) That's not too far out, though, since it happens on TV three episodes into the second production block. Second is Susan's use of the phrase "meme farms", followed by an immediate comment that she shouldn't have mentioned it, since it was an idea from after Iananbarbara's time. Indeed, the concept was only formulated in the 1970s (by Richard Dawkins).

There's an interesting contrast between these two features. The first is something that could easily have been shown on TV at the time. That it wasn't done more often is mainly due to the way the program worked as a single ongoing narrative, with one serial linking straight into the next - indeed, they had to have a cliffhanger leading into The Slave Traders, which they then cheekily ignored - but it's something that the Companion Chronicles don't have to worry about. The second feature maps nicely onto moments like Susan's comments about decimalisation, and so is an example of a technique the show had already tried; but the specifics weren't possible, given that predicting the idea of memes in 1964 would have been pretty darned unlikely, let alone the name!

The third out-of-era feature is different again, a matter of intent. In this episode it becomes quite clear that almost everyone except Ian - including Barbara - thinks of Iananbarbara as "an item". This issue is a bit tricksy, and because this review is already a monster I'll save it for next time - I'm quite sure that the subject will come up again in episode 2! For now, I want to say that the different reactions when the other travellers believe that Ian has been on a date with Hypatia are varied and perfectly judged. Hypatia's own comments - the way she gently wards Ian off when she mistakenly thinks he is coming on to her, and her amused deductions about Barbara after the fact - are a joy.

There are also some other very nice touches in this episode. Ian's wry comment that the travellers don't have Sophocles' comedies where they come from (and Hypatia's disdain for the quality of the writing) made me smile, as well as wonder how many of the lost works mentioned in Aristotle's Poetics they got to see. I'm odd like that. I also enjoyed the disagreement between Iananbarbara over whether they were dealing with science or history, which pokes gentle fun at the early division of focus among both serials and cast. That this division becomes part of what drives the plot is just icing.

[Major spoilers coming up now - I strongly recommend listening to the episode before reading on. You have been warned!]

Time to talk about the ending. The use of the mysterious book to set up the plot for the second episode was a classic Chekhov's Gun moment, developing naturally from the events of the first scene. It came as a total surprise to me that this wasn't a pure historical - which is the fourth way it deviates from the era. Like the (lack of) cliffhanger resolution which opens The Romans, it's the pure brass cheek of this that saves it. The identity of the threat - a recurring foe, though not one from the early 1960s - was also a surprise. I have only previously encountered it once, in my second(?) Companion Chronicle, where it proved an intriguing variation on an old theme.

Then we have the cliffhanger itself, which was delightful for two reasons. One was the fakeout, with a potential mundane problem being interrupted by the arrival of the main threat; the other was the way this last echoed the closing moments of opening episodes from 1960s serials, particularly World's End (the first episode of The Dalek Invasion of Earth). Spot on.

Rating:
9.5/10, only dropping half a mark for Ian being just a little too dense and for a fairly standard use of the "can't change history" meme. I guess I just expect more from the author of The Time Travellers!

Next Time:
The Pathway to the Stars.

No comments:

Post a Comment